top of page
ISHIDA
KOHEI

歴史におけるVR的なもの

"VR-ness in History" Doctor Thesis, 2023 and MOT Annual Extra, 2023

歴史の中には実はVR的なものが遍在していた。極楽浄土は別世界をなんとか構築し入り込んで別世界を祈る等、VR的な世界観と通じる。茶室は元々都市の中の別世界「市中の山居」として構築された。様々なVR的なものの様相とメカニズムを「待像・想像・実像」の3項の関係で捉えた。待像はVR的な像、実像は普段人々が生きて共有される世界、想像は個人のイメージを指す。VR的な像=待像と他の像の関係を5タイプに分類し分析した。

かつてはVR的な像は思い込みや感じ方に近い領域にあったと考えられる。メディアや技術の発展に伴い、待像はどこでも誰でも再現・共有できるものとなった。その結果、既存世界とVR的なものの像が「ズレ」たものとして表出するものともなってきた。それが都市における人の認知の断絶も生みうる。

2023 : 新建築2023年1月号(「待像」これからの建築・都市に向けて 2023年のキーワード)
2023 : MOT Annual Extra,東京都現代美術館
2024 : 新建築2024年2月号巻頭論考『待像論』

There has actually been a pervasive presence of VR-ness in history.
For instance, the concept of the Pure Land (Gokuraku Jōdo) embodies an attempt to construct and enter an alternate world—a practice deeply connected to a VR-like worldview. Similarly, the tea room was originally conceived as an “urban mountain retreat” (shichū no sankyo), a separate world within the city.

I have sought to understand the various manifestations and mechanisms of such VR-ness through the triadic relationship of “taizō (waiting realities), sōzō (imagination), and jitsuzō (common realities).”Here, taizō refers to the VR-like image, jitsuzō to the shared world of everyday life, and sōzō to the individual’s inner image. The relationships between the VR-ness (taizō) and the other two were classified into five types for analytical purposes.

In the past, VR-ness likely belonged to a domain closer to personal belief or subjective feeling. However, with the advancement of media and technology, taizō has become something that anyone, anywhere can reproduce and share. As a result, representations of the existing world and those of VR-ness have begun to appear as “discrepancies” between worlds—phenomena that can even lead to cognitive disconnection within urban environments.

2023 : Shinkenchiku
2023 : MOT Annual Extra, Museum of Contemporary Art Tokyo
2024 : Shinkenchiku

  • グレーTwitterのアイコン

 © ISHIDA KOHEI

bottom of page